You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nutrition and hydration in dying patients: the perceptions of acute care nurses
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/jocn.12478 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Isabel Higgins, Pamela van der Riet, Ludmilla Sneesby, Phillip Good |
Abstract |
To explore the perceptions of nurses regarding the provision and nonprovision of medical nutrition and hydration during the end stage of life when death is imminent in the acute care setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 20% |
Psychology | 6 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,021,565
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#2,964
of 5,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,660
of 317,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#38
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.