↓ Skip to main content

On inconsistency in frictional granular systems

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Particle Mechanics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
On inconsistency in frictional granular systems
Published in
Computational Particle Mechanics, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40571-017-0160-9
Authors

Pierre Alart, Mathieu Renouf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,806,691
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Computational Particle Mechanics
#59
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,787
of 310,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Particle Mechanics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.