You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New Canadian guidance on opioid use for chronic pain: necessary but not sufficient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.170431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea D. Furlan, Owen D. Williamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 28 | 53% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 19% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 27% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2017.
All research outputs
#210,987
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#376
of 9,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,362
of 325,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#13
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.