| Title |
Brain Machine Interface and Human Enhancement – An Ethical Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-012-9176-2 |
| Authors |
Karim Jebari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 8 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 27% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,471,900
of 24,698,625 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#126
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,804
of 290,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,625 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.