↓ Skip to main content

Depressive Symptoms and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Initiation Among HIV-Infected Russian Drinkers

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Depressive Symptoms and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Initiation Among HIV-Infected Russian Drinkers
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10461-013-0674-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracie M. Goodness, Tibor P. Palfai, Debbie M. Cheng, Sharon M. Coleman, Carly Bridden, Elena Blokhina, Evgeny Krupitsky, Jeffrey H. Samet

Abstract

The impact of depressive symptoms on ART initiation among Russian HIV-infected heavy drinkers enrolled in a secondary HIV prevention trial (HERMITAGE) was examined. We assessed 133 participants eligible for ART initiation (i.e., CD4 count <350 cells/μl) who were not on ART at baseline. Depressive symptom severity and ART use were measured at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Association between depressive symptoms and subsequent ART initiation was evaluated using GEE logistic regression adjusting for gender, past ART use, injection drug use and heavy drinking. Depressive symptom severity was not significantly associated with lower odds of initiating ART. Cognitive depression symptoms were not statistically significant (global p = 0.05); however, those with the highest level of severity had an AOR of 0.25 (95 % CI 0.09-0.71) for delayed ART initiation. Although the effect of depression severity was not significant, findings suggest a potential role of cognitive depression symptoms in decisions to initiate ART in this population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 26%
Psychology 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 34 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#1,005,157
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#101
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,437
of 312,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.