You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The anatomy of a failed offset
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.022 |
| Authors |
David B. Lindenmayer, Mason Crane, Megan C. Evans, Martine Maron, Philip Gibbons, Sarah Bekessy, Wade Blanchard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 58 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#241,722
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#151
of 6,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,028
of 332,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#4
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.