↓ Skip to main content

Lexical selection with competing distractors: Evidence from left temporal lobe lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Lexical selection with competing distractors: Evidence from left temporal lobe lesions
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1301-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vitória Piai, Robert T. Knight

Abstract

According to the competition account of lexical selection in word production, conceptually driven word retrieval involves the activation of a set of candidate words in left temporal cortex and competitive selection of the intended word from this set, regulated by frontal cortical mechanisms. However, the relative contribution of these brain regions to competitive lexical selection is uncertain. In the present study, five patients with left prefrontal cortex lesions (overlapping in ventral and dorsal lateral cortex), eight patients with left lateral temporal cortex lesions (overlapping in middle temporal gyrus), and 13 matched controls performed a picture-word interference task. Distractor words were semantically related or unrelated to the picture, or the name of the picture (congruent condition). Semantic interference (related vs. unrelated), tapping into competitive lexical selection, was examined. An overall semantic interference effect was observed for the control and left-temporal groups separately. The left-frontal patients did not show a reliable semantic interference effect as a group. The left-temporal patients had increased semantic interference in the error rates relative to controls. Error distribution analyses indicated that these patients had more hesitant responses for the related than for the unrelated condition. We propose that left middle temporal lesions affect the lexical activation component, making lexical selection more susceptible to errors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Master 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 30%
Neuroscience 5 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 33%