↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin-D concentrations, cardiovascular risk and events - a review of epidemiological evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin-D concentrations, cardiovascular risk and events - a review of epidemiological evidence
Published in
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11154-017-9417-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Robert Grübler, Winfried März, Stefan Pilz, Tanja B. Grammer, Christian Trummer, Christian Müllner, Verena Schwetz, Marlene Pandis, Nicolas Verheyen, Andreas Tomaschitz, Antonella Fiordelisi, Daniela Laudisio, Ersilia Cipolletta, Guido Iaccarino

Abstract

Vitamin D has long been established as an elemental factor of bone physiology. Beyond mineral metabolism, the expression of the vitamin D receptor has been identified throughout the cardiovascular (CV) system. Experimental studies showed beneficial effects of vitamin D on heart and vessels, but vitamin D intoxication in animals also led to hypercalcemia and vascular calcification. Our knowledge has been extended by epidemiological studies that showed that 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels are inversely associated with an increased CV risk itself, but also with established CV risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Conversely, randomized controlled trials could not document significant and consistent effects of vitamin D supplementation on CV risk or events. Potential explanations may lie in differences in reference ranges or the possibility that low vitamin D in CV disease is only an epiphenomenon. In the latter case, the key question is why low 25(OH)D levels are such a strong predictor of health. While we wait for new data, the current conclusion is that vitamin D is a strong risk marker for CV risk factors and for CV diseases itself.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Other 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#420
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,600
of 312,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.