| Title |
Review participation in modern code review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Empirical Software Engineering, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10664-016-9452-6 |
| Authors |
Patanamon Thongtanunam, Shane McIntosh, Ahmed E. Hassan, Hajimu Iida |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 21 | 55% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#625
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,743
of 316,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#27
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.