You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lack of effectiveness of routine clinic and blood test‐based follow‐up for diffuse large B cell lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Haematology, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bjh.14745 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beth Chasty, Michael Patterson, Louise J. Murray, Rod Johnson, Emma Thomas, Di Gilson, Cathy Burton, Robin J. D. Prestwich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Romania | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 80% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,076,370
of 24,493,651 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#437
of 7,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,171
of 315,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#6
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.