Gaps in knowledge and data driving uncertainty in models of photosynthesis

Michael C. Dietze

Regional and global models of the terrestrial biosphere depend critically on models of photosynthesis when predicting impacts of global change. This paper focuses on identifying the primary data needs of these models, what scales drive uncertainty, and how to improve measurements. Overall, there is a need for an open, cross-discipline database on leaf-level photosynthesis in general, and response curves in particular. The parameters in photosynthetic models are not constant through time, space, or canopy position but there is a need for a better understanding of whether relationships with drivers, such as leaf nitrogen, are themselves scale dependent. Across time scales, as ecosystem models become more sophisticated in their representations of succession they needs to be able to approximate sunfleck responses to capture understory growth and survival. At both high and low latitudes, photosynthetic data are inadequate in general and there is a particular need to better understand thermal acclimation. Simple models of acclimation suggest that shifts in optimal temperature are important. However, there is little advantage to synoptic-scale responses and circadian rhythms may be more beneficial than acclimation over shorter timescales. At high latitudes, there is a need for a better understanding of low-temperature photosynthetic limits, while at low latitudes the need is for a better understanding of phosphorus limitations on photosynthesis. In terms of sampling, measuring multivariate photosynthetic response surfaces are potentially more efficient and more accurate than traditional univariate response curves. Finally, there is a need for greater community involvement in model validation and model-data synthesis.