↓ Skip to main content

Overseas Chinese Archaeology: Historical Foundations, Current Reflections, and New Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Archaeology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 199)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Overseas Chinese Archaeology: Historical Foundations, Current Reflections, and New Directions
Published in
Historical Archaeology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/bf03377096
Authors

Barbara L. Voss, Rebecca Allen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Israel 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 35%
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 71%
Arts and Humanities 4 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,527,793
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Historical Archaeology
#48
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,534
of 314,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Archaeology
#13
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.