| Title |
Clinical and Translational Potential of MRI Evaluation in Knee Osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Rheumatology Reports, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11926-013-0391-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daichi Hayashi, Ali Guermazi, C. Kent Kwoh |
| Abstract |
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an increasingly important imaging technique in osteoarthritis (OA) research, and is widely used in the ongoing endeavor to understand the pathogenesis of OA and to develop structure and disease-modifying OA drugs. MRI offers semiquantitative, quantitative and compositional evaluation of knee OA, and enables visualization of tissues that are not seen by radiography, including but not limited to cartilage, meniscus, bone marrow lesions, synovitis, and muscles. It is now recognized that contrast-enhanced MRI enables more accurate evaluation of synovitis than MRI without contrast. Because of its ability to visualize multiple pain-related tissue pathology in three dimensions, MRI is the best modality for imaging of OA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 46% |
| Engineering | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,702,569
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#432
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,910
of 306,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.