↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the additive risks of PSII herbicide exposure to the Great Barrier Reef

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Pollution Bulletin, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the additive risks of PSII herbicide exposure to the Great Barrier Reef
Published in
Marine Pollution Bulletin, December 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.11.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen E. Lewis, Britta Schaffelke, Melanie Shaw, Zoë T. Bainbridge, Ken W. Rohde, Karen Kennedy, Aaron M. Davis, Bronwyn L. Masters, Michelle J. Devlin, Jochen F. Mueller, Jon E. Brodie

Abstract

Herbicide residues have been measured in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon at concentrations which have the potential to harm marine plant communities. Monitoring on the Great Barrier Reef lagoon following wet season discharge show that 80% of the time when herbicides are detected, more than one are present. These herbicides have been shown to act in an additive manner with regards to photosystem-II inhibition. In this study, the area of the Great Barrier Reef considered to be at risk from herbicides is compared when exposures are considered for each herbicide individually and also for herbicide mixtures. Two normalisation indices for herbicide mixtures were calculated based on current guidelines and PSII inhibition thresholds. The results show that the area of risk for most regions is greatly increased under the proposed additive PSII inhibition threshold and that the resilience of this important ecosystem could be reduced by exposure to these herbicides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 35 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 20%
Chemistry 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,572,065
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#2,392
of 9,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,310
of 249,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.