You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Charting the unknown epitranscriptome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/nrm.2017.49 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eva Maria Novoa, Christopher E. Mason, John S. Mattick |
Abstract |
RNA modifications can alter RNA structure-function relationships and various cellular processes. However, the genomic distribution and biological roles of most RNA modifications remain uncharacterized. Here, we propose using phage display antibody technology and direct sequencing through nanopores to facilitate systematic interrogation of the distribution, location and dynamics of RNA modifications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 24% |
Canada | 4 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
China | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 58% |
Scientists | 12 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 134 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 22% |
Researcher | 28 | 21% |
Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 21% |
Unknown | 18 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,137,566
of 24,694,993 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
#593
of 2,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,799
of 315,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,694,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.