↓ Skip to main content

Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01542229
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Marshall Townsend, Gary D. Levy

Abstract

Male (n = 170) and female (n = 212) college students viewed photographs, which had been prerated for physical attractiveness, of three opposite-sex individuals. These photographs were paired with three levels of occupational status and income. Subjects indicated their willingness to engage in relationships of varying levels of sexual intimacy and marital potential with the portrayed individuals. Analyses of variance, correlations, and trend analyses supported the hypotheses. Compared to men, women are more likely to prefer or insist that sexual intercourse occur in relationships that involve affection and marital potential, and women place more emphasis than men do on partners' SES in such relationships. Consequently, men's SES and their willingness and ability to invest affection and resources in relationships may often outweigh the effects of their physical attractiveness in women's actual selection of partners. These results and the literature reviewed are more consistent with parental investment theory than with the view that these sex differences are solely the result of differential access to resources and differential socialization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 60%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,161,405
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#592
of 3,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157
of 15,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.