You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An observational study of retail availability and in-store marketing of e-cigarettes in London: potential to undermine recent tobacco control gains?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Hsu, Allison E Myers, Kurt M Ribisl, Theresa M Marteau |
| Abstract |
E-cigarette companies and vendors claim the potential of e-cigarettes to help smokers reduce or quit tobacco use. E-cigarettes also have the potential to renormalise smoking. The purpose of this study was to describe the availability and in-store marketing of e-cigarettes in London, UK stores selling tobacco and alcohol. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 43% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 23% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 18% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,431,580
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,621
of 25,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,685
of 320,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#32
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.