↓ Skip to main content

Development of a placebo effect model combined with a dropout model for bipolar disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Development of a placebo effect model combined with a dropout model for bipolar disorder
Published in
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10928-013-9305-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wan Sun, Thomas P. Laughren, Hao Zhu, Guenther Hochhaus, Yaning Wang

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a placebo model for bipolar disorder to help optimize clinical trial designs for studies targeting manic episodes in bipolar disorder. A bipolar disease database was built based on individual longitudinal data collected from over 3,000 patients in 11 clinical trials for 5 approved bipolar drugs. An empirical placebo effect model with an exponential decay process plus a linear progression process was developed to quantify the time course of the Young Mania Rating Scale total score based on only placebo data from the database. In order to describe the dropout pattern during the trials, a parametric survival model was developed and the Weibull distribution was identified to be the best distribution to describe the data. Based on the likelihood ratio test, it was found that patients with higher baseline score, slower disease improvement and more rapid disease progression tended to dropout earlier, and the trial features such as trial starting year and trial site were also significant covariates for dropout. A combination of the placebo effect model and the dropout model was applied to simulate new clinical trials through Monte-Carlo simulation. Both the placebo effect model and dropout model described the observed data reasonably well based on various diagnostic plots. The joint placebo response and dropout models can serve as a tool to simulate the most likely level of placebo response with the expected dropout pattern to help design a new clinical trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Psychology 4 10%
Mathematics 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#372
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,420
of 206,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.