You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Architecture of epigenetic reprogramming following Twist1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r144 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel G Malouf, Joseph H Taube, Yue Lu, Tapasree Roysarkar, Shoghag Panjarian, Marcos RH Estecio, Jaroslav Jelinek, Jumpei Yamazaki, Noel J-M Raynal, Hai Long, Tomomitsu Tahara, Agata Tinnirello, Priyanka Ramachandran, Xiu-Ying Zhang, Shoudan Liang, Sendurai A Mani, Jean-Pierre J Issa |
| Abstract |
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is known to impart metastasis and stemness characteristics in breast cancer. To characterize the epigenetic reprogramming following Twist1-induced EMT, we characterized the epigenetic and transcriptome landscapes using whole-genome transcriptome analysis by RNA-seq, DNA methylation by digital restriction enzyme analysis of methylation (DREAM) and histone modifications by CHIP-seq of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in immortalized human mammary epithelial cells relative to cells induced to undergo EMT by Twist1. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,240,151
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,860
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,942
of 320,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#77
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.