↓ Skip to main content

Complications in Brief: Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Tears

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Complications in Brief: Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Tears
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3396-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Robert Volk, Gautam P. Yagnik, John W. Uribe

Abstract

Effective treatment of knee extensor mechanism disruptions requires prompt diagnosis and thoughtful decision-making with surgical and nonsurgical approaches. When surgery is chosen, excellent surgical technique can result in excellent outcomes. Complications and failures arise from missed or delayed diagnoses and from technical problems in the operating room. In particular, inappropriate surgical timing (especially late surgery), misplaced patellar drill holes, and failure to address concomitant injuries can result in complications seen when repairing a patellar or quadriceps tendon tear. We review the complications that can occur during treatment of these injuries (Table 1).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Other 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Sports and Recreations 6 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,334
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,808
of 320,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#64
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.