Title |
Pine Wilt Disease: a threat to European forestry
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10658-011-9924-x |
Authors |
Cláudia Vicente, Margarida Espada, Paulo Vieira, Manuel Mota |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 2 | 1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 41 | 28% |
Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 20 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 24 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 28 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,525,716
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#52
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,245
of 255,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.