| Title |
Receptor–ligand molecular docking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12551-013-0130-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabella A. Guedes, Camila S. de Magalhães, Laurent E. Dardenne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,039 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1029 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 148 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 132 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 11% |
| Researcher | 63 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 49 | 5% |
| Other | 104 | 10% |
| Unknown | 430 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 160 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 151 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 84 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 91 | 9% |
| Unknown | 460 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,338,735
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#54
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,972
of 326,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.