↓ Skip to main content

The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle
Published in
Osteoporosis International, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00198-010-1422-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. A. Greendale, N. S. Nili, M.-H. Huang, L. Seeger, A. S. Karlamangla

Abstract

Hyperkyphosis is implicated in a mounting list of negative outcomes, including higher mortality. Hyperkyphosis research is hindered due to difficulties inherent in its measurement. By showing that three clinical measures of kyphosis are suitable for use in large scale, longitudinal, hyperkyphosis studies, we will facilitate much needed research in this field.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Unknown 141 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 22%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 19%
Sports and Recreations 15 10%
Engineering 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,215,721
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,962
of 3,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,758
of 98,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#35
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.