↓ Skip to main content

Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
92 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1958 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1609 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery
Published in
Nature, December 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukinori Okada, Di Wu, Gosia Trynka, Towfique Raj, Chikashi Terao, Katsunori Ikari, Yuta Kochi, Koichiro Ohmura, Akari Suzuki, Shinji Yoshida, Robert R. Graham, Arun Manoharan, Ward Ortmann, Tushar Bhangale, Joshua C. Denny, Robert J. Carroll, Anne E. Eyler, Jeffrey D. Greenberg, Joel M. Kremer, Dimitrios A. Pappas, Lei Jiang, Jian Yin, Lingying Ye, Ding-Feng Su, Jian Yang, Gang Xie, Ed Keystone, Harm-Jan Westra, Tõnu Esko, Andres Metspalu, Xuezhong Zhou, Namrata Gupta, Daniel Mirel, Eli A. Stahl, Dorothée Diogo, Jing Cui, Katherine Liao, Michael H. Guo, Keiko Myouzen, Takahisa Kawaguchi, Marieke J. H. Coenen, Piet L. C. M. van Riel, Mart A. F. J. van de Laar, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Tom W. J. Huizinga, Philippe Dieudé, Xavier Mariette, S. Louis Bridges Jr, Alexandra Zhernakova, Rene E. M. Toes, Paul P. Tak, Corinne Miceli-Richard, So-Young Bang, Hye-Soon Lee, Javier Martin, Miguel A. Gonzalez-Gay, Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist, Lisbeth Ärlestig, Hyon K. Choi, Yoichiro Kamatani, Pilar Galan, Mark Lathrop, Steve Eyre, John Bowes, Anne Barton, Niek de Vries, Larry W. Moreland, Lindsey A. Criswell, Elizabeth W. Karlson, Atsuo Taniguchi, Ryo Yamada, Michiaki Kubo, Jun S. Liu, Sang-Cheol Bae, Jane Worthington, Leonid Padyukov, Lars Klareskog, Peter K. Gregersen, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Barbara E. Stranger, Philip L. De Jager, Lude Franke, Peter M. Visscher, Matthew A. Brown, Hisashi Yamanaka, Tsuneyo Mimori, Atsushi Takahashi, Huji Xu, Timothy W. Behrens, Katherine A. Siminovitch, Shigeki Momohara, Fumihiko Matsuda, Kazuhiko Yamamoto, Robert M. Plenge

Abstract

A major challenge in human genetics is to devise a systematic strategy to integrate disease-associated variants with diverse genomic and biological data sets to provide insight into disease pathogenesis and guide drug discovery for complex traits such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here we performed a genome-wide association study meta-analysis in a total of >100,000 subjects of European and Asian ancestries (29,880 RA cases and 73,758 controls), by evaluating ∼10 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. We discovered 42 novel RA risk loci at a genome-wide level of significance, bringing the total to 101 (refs 2 - 4). We devised an in silico pipeline using established bioinformatics methods based on functional annotation, cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci and pathway analyses--as well as novel methods based on genetic overlap with human primary immunodeficiency, haematological cancer somatic mutations and knockout mouse phenotypes--to identify 98 biological candidate genes at these 101 risk loci. We demonstrate that these genes are the targets of approved therapies for RA, and further suggest that drugs approved for other indications may be repurposed for the treatment of RA. Together, this comprehensive genetic study sheds light on fundamental genes, pathways and cell types that contribute to RA pathogenesis, and provides empirical evidence that the genetics of RA can provide important information for drug discovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,609 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Japan 6 <1%
Denmark 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 1550 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 341 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 321 20%
Student > Bachelor 150 9%
Student > Master 148 9%
Other 100 6%
Other 285 18%
Unknown 264 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 370 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 326 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 279 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 89 6%
Computer Science 36 2%
Other 191 12%
Unknown 318 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 225. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#173,126
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#10,635
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,507
of 325,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#128
of 915 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 915 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.