| Title |
Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Life Sciences, Society and Policy, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40504-017-0052-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gigesh Thomas, Johan De Tavernier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| India | 4 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 53 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 88% |
| Scientists | 9 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 57 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 207. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#192,680
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Life Sciences, Society and Policy
#2
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,992
of 326,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Life Sciences, Society and Policy
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.