| Title |
Ultrasonic vocalizations: evidence for an affective opponent process during cocaine self-administration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-013-3309-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Barker, Steven J. Simmons, Lisa C. Servilio, Danielle Bercovicz, Sisi Ma, David H. Root, Anthony P. Pawlak, Mark O. West |
| Abstract |
Preclinical models of cocaine addiction in the rodent have shown that cocaine induces both positive and negative affective states. These observations have led to the notion that the initial positive/euphoric state induced by cocaine administration may be followed by an opposing, negative process. In the rodent, one method for inferring positive and negative affective states involves measuring their ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs). Previous USV recordings from our laboratory suggested that the transition between positive and negative affect might involve decaying or sub-satiety levels of self-administered cocaine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 24% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 14 | 41% |
| Psychology | 8 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#12,890,747
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#3,866
of 5,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,160
of 215,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#25
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.