↓ Skip to main content

Fitting growth curve models in the Bayesian framework

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Fitting growth curve models in the Bayesian framework
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1281-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zita Oravecz, Chelsea Muth

Abstract

Growth curve modeling is a popular methodological tool due to its flexibility in simultaneously analyzing both within-person effects (e.g., assessing change over time for one person) and between-person effects (e.g., comparing differences in the change trajectories across people). This paper is a practical exposure to fitting growth curve models in the hierarchical Bayesian framework. First the mathematical formulation of growth curve models is provided. Then we give step-by-step guidelines on how to fit these models in the hierarchical Bayesian framework with corresponding computer scripts (JAGS and R). To illustrate the Bayesian GCM approach, we analyze a data set from a longitudinal study of marital relationship quality. We provide our computer code and example data set so that the reader can have hands-on experience fitting the growth curve model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 27%
Researcher 33 20%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 42%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 34 20%