↓ Skip to main content

Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
778 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200636110-00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie J. Sharman, Andrew G. Cresswell, Stephan Riek

Abstract

Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching techniques are commonly used in the athletic and clinical environments to enhance both active and passive range of motion (ROM) with a view to optimising motor performance and rehabilitation. PNF stretching is positioned in the literature as the most effective stretching technique when the aim is to increase ROM, particularly in respect to short-term changes in ROM. With due consideration of the heterogeneity across the applied PNF stretching research, a summary of the findings suggests that an 'active' PNF stretching technique achieves the greatest gains in ROM, e.g. utilising a shortening contraction of the opposing muscle to place the target muscle on stretch, followed by a static contraction of the target muscle. The inclusion of a shortening contraction of the opposing muscle appears to have the greatest impact on enhancing ROM. When including a static contraction of the target muscle, this needs to be held for approximately 3 seconds at no more than 20% of a maximum voluntary contraction. The greatest changes in ROM generally occur after the first repetition and in order to achieve more lasting changes in ROM, PNF stretching needs to be performed once or twice per week. The superior changes in ROM that PNF stretching often produces compared with other stretching techniques has traditionally been attributed to autogenic and/or reciprocal inhibition, although the literature does not support this hypothesis. Instead, and in the absence of a biomechanical explanation, the contemporary view proposes that PNF stretching influences the point at which stretch is perceived or tolerated. The mechanism(s) underpinning the change in stretch perception or tolerance are not known, although pain modulation has been suggested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 778 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 757 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 181 23%
Student > Master 139 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 5%
Researcher 33 4%
Other 140 18%
Unknown 205 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 177 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 151 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 121 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 4%
Social Sciences 11 1%
Other 67 9%
Unknown 223 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#765,512
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#699
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,423
of 285,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#80
of 784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.