↓ Skip to main content

How to build a continental scale fireball camera network

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Astronomy, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
How to build a continental scale fireball camera network
Published in
Experimental Astronomy, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10686-017-9532-7
Authors

Robert M. Howie, Jonathan Paxman, Philip A. Bland, Martin C. Towner, Martin Cupak, Eleanor K. Sansom, Hadrien A. R. Devillepoix

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 20%
Chemistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,914,912
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Astronomy
#166
of 428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,910
of 327,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Astronomy
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.