↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Spanish Version of the WOMAC Questionnaire for Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Validation of the Spanish Version of the WOMAC Questionnaire for Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, November 2002
DOI 10.1007/s100670200117
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Escobar, J. M. Quintana, A. Bilbao, J. Azkárate, J. I. Güenaga

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate a translated version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire in Spanish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). The WOMAC questionnaire and the SF-36 were administered to a sample of 269 patients on the waiting list for hip or knee replacement. We studied the convergent validity and the item-scale correlation using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's pi. For the reliability study we used another sample of 58 patients who received the WOMAC twice within 15 days. The Pearson's, Spearman's pi, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha. The responsiveness study was carried out by resending the two questionnaires to all patients 6 months after surgical intervention; responsiveness was measured by means of the paired t-test, the effect size I and the standardised response mean. The Pearson's coefficients for the convergent validity ranged from -0.52 to -0.63. The coefficients obtained for the item-scale correlation of the pain area were 0.74 or higher, 0.91 or higher for stiffness, and 0.61 or higher for function. When measuring the test-retest reliability, the coefficients ranged from 0.66 to 0.81. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.81 to 0.93. The responsiveness showed an effect size I ranging from 1.5 to 2.2 in patients who underwent hip replacement; for those who underwent knee replacement the range was 1 to 1.8. The standardised response mean ranged from 1.3 to 1.9 for patients with hip OA; those with knee OA ranged from 0.8 to 1.5. The Spanish version of WOMAC is a valid, reliable and responsive instrument in patients with hip or knee OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 174 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Master 21 12%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 44 25%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 15%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 61 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,013
of 3,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,465
of 52,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.