↓ Skip to main content

Dressing the Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in skin & wound care (Print), January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dressing the Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site
Published in
Advances in skin & wound care (Print), January 2014
DOI 10.1097/01.asw.0000437786.92529.22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matilda Karlsson, Margareta Lindgren, Ingmarie Jarnhed-Andersson, Erkki Tarpila

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to compare Aquacel (ConvaTec, Skillman, New Jersey), Allevyn (Smith & Nephew, St Petersburg, Florida), and Mediskin I (Mölnlycke, Health Care AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 31 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 41%
Engineering 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 34 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Advances in skin & wound care (Print)
#1,148
of 1,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,184
of 319,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in skin & wound care (Print)
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.