| Title |
Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, December 1974
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01239496 |
| Authors |
N. Barton, R. Lien, J. Lunde |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 875 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 867 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 155 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 124 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 10% |
| Researcher | 80 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 4% |
| Other | 133 | 15% |
| Unknown | 262 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 389 | 44% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 140 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 1% |
| Energy | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 31 | 4% |
| Unknown | 286 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,864,089
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
#9
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#364
of 20,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them