↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and Treatment of Vascular Malformations of the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Neurology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and Treatment of Vascular Malformations of the Brain
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Neurology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11940-013-0279-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley A. Gross, Rose Du

Abstract

Vascular malformations of the brain are often found in the workup of intracranial hemorrhage, seizures, focal neurological deficits, or headaches. Although CT-angiography may reveal an underlying arteriovenous malformation (AVM) or arteriovenous fistula (AVF), other vascular malformations are not easily evaluated on CT and are better seen on magnetic resonance imaging. For the evaluation of AVMs and AVFs, formal digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standard. In the case of AVMs, AVFs, or cavernous malformations (CMs), the lesion may serve as the etiologic source of the symptoms and thus warrant treatment. When feasible, microsurgical resection is the optimal treatment option for AVMs and CMs. Endovascular embolization may serve as a crucial adjunct to microsurgery in the treatment of AVMs. Depending on their vascular anatomy, AVFs may be treated by either endovascular embolization or microsurgery. For inoperable AVMs and dural AVFs necessitating treatment, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may serve as a viable treatment alternative. Capillary telangiectasias and developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) are often incidental findings; they may be found in association with CMs but are not generally considered targets for treatment. Herein, we review diagnostic methods, natural history, and treatment options for these cerebral vascular malformations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 17 28%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 49%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,359,382
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#366
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,648
of 306,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.