↓ Skip to main content

May common model biases reduce CMIP5’s ability to simulate the recent Pacific La Niña-like cooling?

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
May common model biases reduce CMIP5’s ability to simulate the recent Pacific La Niña-like cooling?
Published in
Climate Dynamics, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3688-8
Authors

Jing-Jia Luo, Gang Wang, Dietmar Dommenget

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 53%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,610,700
of 25,339,932 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#668
of 5,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,515
of 316,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#17
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,339,932 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.