You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vascular Medicine, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1358863x17701592 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Writing Committee Members, Marie D. Gerhard-Herman, Heather L. Gornik, Coletta Barrett, Neal R. Barshes, Matthew A. Corriere, Douglas E. Drachman, Lee A. Fleisher, Francis Gerry R. Fowkes, Naomi M. Hamburg, Scott Kinlay, Robert Lookstein, Sanjay Misra, Leila Mureebe, Jeffrey W. Olin, Rajan A.G. Patel, Judith G. Regensteiner, Andres Schanzer, Mehdi H. Shishehbor, Kerry J. Stewart, Diane Treat-Jacobson, M. Eileen Walsh, ACC/AHA Task Force Members, Jonathan L. Halperin, Glenn N. Levine, Sana M. Al-Khatib, Kim K. Birtcher, Biykem Bozkurt, Ralph G. Brindis, Joaquin E. Cigarroa, Lesley H. Curtis, Lee A. Fleisher, Federico Gentile, Samuel Gidding, Mark A. Hlatky, John Ikonomidis, José Joglar, Susan J. Pressler, Duminda N. Wijeysundera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 524 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 14% |
| Researcher | 50 | 9% |
| Other | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 45 | 9% |
| Other | 118 | 22% |
| Unknown | 148 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 228 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 9% |
| Unknown | 178 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,546,715
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Medicine
#80
of 1,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,765
of 311,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Medicine
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.