↓ Skip to main content

Neutron-Mapping Polymer Flow: Scattering, Flow Visualization, and Molecular Theory

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neutron-Mapping Polymer Flow: Scattering, Flow Visualization, and Molecular Theory
Published in
Science, September 2003
DOI 10.1126/science.1086952
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Bent, L. R. Hutchings, R. W. Richards, T. Gough, R. Spares, P. D. Coates, I. Grillo, O. G. Harlen, D. J. Read, R. S. Graham, A. E. Likhtman, D. J. Groves, T. M. Nicholson, T. C. B. McLeish

Abstract

Flows of complex fluids need to be understood at both macroscopic and molecular scales, because it is the macroscopic response that controls the fluid behavior, but the molecular scale that ultimately gives rise to rheological and solid-state properties. Here the flow field of an entangled polymer melt through an extended contraction, typical of many polymer processes, is imaged optically and by small-angle neutron scattering. The dual-probe technique samples both the macroscopic stress field in the flow and the microscopic configuration of the polymer molecules at selected points. The results are compared with a recent "tube model" molecular theory of entangled melt flow that is able to calculate both the stress and the single-chain structure factor from first principles. The combined action of the three fundamental entangled processes of reptation, contour length fluctuation, and convective constraint release is essential to account quantitatively for the rich rheological behavior. The multiscale approach unearths a new feature: Orientation at the length scale of the entire chain decays considerably more slowly than at the smaller entanglement length.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 18%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 24 30%
Engineering 18 23%
Chemistry 13 16%
Materials Science 10 13%
Chemical Engineering 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 4 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,934,754
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Science
#46,854
of 77,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,749
of 51,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#190
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.