↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing Surgical Performance Outcomes Through Process‐driven Care: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Enhancing Surgical Performance Outcomes Through Process‐driven Care: A Systematic Review
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00268-013-2424-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip H. Pucher, Rajesh Aggarwal, Pritam Singh, Ara Darzi

Abstract

Recent evidence has demonstrated the variability in quality of postoperative care, as measured by rates of failure to rescue (FTR). The identification of structure- and process-related factors affecting the quality of postoperative care is the first step towards understanding and improving outcomes. The aim of this review is to review current evidence for structure and process factors affecting postoperative care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,767,754
of 23,607,611 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,533
of 4,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,048
of 309,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#7
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,607,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.