↓ Skip to main content

One size fits all? High frequency trading, tick size changes and the implications for exchanges: market quality and market structure considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
One size fits all? High frequency trading, tick size changes and the implications for exchanges: market quality and market structure considerations
Published in
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11156-017-0632-2
Authors

Thanos Verousis, Pietro Perotti, Georgios Sermpinis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 19%
Computer Science 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
#59
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,527
of 311,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.