↓ Skip to main content

Detectable Neuropsychological Differences in Early Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 496)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Detectable Neuropsychological Differences in Early Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11065-017-9345-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Duke Han, Caroline P. Nguyen, Nikki H. Stricker, Daniel A. Nation

Abstract

The development of methods for in vivo detection of cerebral beta amyloid retention and tau accumulation have been increasingly useful in characterizing preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). While the association between these biomarkers and eventual AD has been demonstrated among cognitively intact older adults, the link between biomarkers and neurocognitive ability remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to test the hypothesis that cognitively intact older adults would show statistically discernable differences in neuropsychological performance by amyloid status (amyloid negative = A-, amyloid positive = A+). We secondarily hypothesized a third group characterized by either CSF tau pathology or neurodegeneration, in addition to amyloidosis (A+/N+ or Stage 2), would show lower neuropsychology scores than the amyloid positive group (A+/N- or Stage 1) when compared to the amyloid negative group. Pubmed, PsychINFO, and other sources were searched for relevant articles, yielding 775 total sources. After review for inclusion/exclusion criteria, duplicates, and risk of bias, 61 studies were utilized in the final meta-analysis. Results showed A+ was associated with poorer performance in the domains of global cognitive function, memory, language, visuospatial ability, processing speed, and attention/working memory/executive functions when compared to A-. A+/N+ showed lower performances on memory measures when compared to A+/N- in secondary analyses based on a smaller subset of studies. Results support the notion that neuropsychological measures are sensitive to different stages of preclinical AD among cognitively intact older adults. Further research is needed to determine what constitutes meaningful differences in neuropsychological performance among cognitively intact older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 44 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 32%
Neuroscience 26 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 48 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#337,220
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#7
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,907
of 326,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them