↓ Skip to main content

Pharmakotherapie des Morbus Parkinson

Overview of attention for article published in Der Nervenarzt, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Pharmakotherapie des Morbus Parkinson
Published in
Der Nervenarzt, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00115-017-0345-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Müller-Rebstein, C. Trenkwalder, W. H. Oertel, C. Culmsee, G. Eckermann, G. U. Höglinger

Abstract

This overview focuses on the aspects of the pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease, which is one of the most common disorders of the nervous system. This article presents the complexity of the pharmacotherapy of geriatric patients with neurological diseases. Information about the potential risk factors and aspects of drug safety in the pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease. Selective literature search using PubMed and the scientific-clinical experience of the authors. Patients with Parkinson's disease are usually geriatric patients with concomitant diseases. As a result they are often treated with comedication which leads to a complex medication regime with more than five drugs. Such polypharmacy increases the risk of adverse drug events due to the rising number of possible interactions and contraindications. To control this risk and maintain a safe therapy, certain measures should be considered. This implies additional need for educational work in order to create awareness regarding potential adverse drug events. In certain cases of diagnosed comorbidities or relevant drug prescriptions in the medication regime, follow-up examinations should be conducted. Specific parameters of Parkinson's disease, the health-related quality of life of affected patients and the quality of pharmacotherapeutic drug safety can be improved by targeted monitoring of the medication regime. As a result, the overall drug safety can be increased.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#21,141,111
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Der Nervenarzt
#771
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,595
of 312,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Der Nervenarzt
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.