↓ Skip to main content

Advances in plant food processing in the Near Eastern Epipalaeolithic and implications for improved edibility and nutrient bioaccessibility: an experimental assessment of Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.…

Overview of attention for article published in Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 418)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Advances in plant food processing in the Near Eastern Epipalaeolithic and implications for improved edibility and nutrient bioaccessibility: an experimental assessment of Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla (sea club-rush)
Published in
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00334-008-0162-x
Authors

Michèle M. Wollstonecroft, Peter R. Ellis, Gordon C. Hillman, Dorian Q. Fuller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Argentina 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 87 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 24 26%
Social Sciences 22 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 17%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,419,138
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#36
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,630
of 83,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them