↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetics and its implications for ecotoxicology

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Epigenetics and its implications for ecotoxicology
Published in
Ecotoxicology, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10646-011-0634-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michiel B. Vandegehuchte, Colin R. Janssen

Abstract

Epigenetics is the study of mitotically or meiotically heritable changes in gene function that occur without a change in the DNA sequence. Interestingly, epigenetic changes can be triggered by environmental factors. Environmental exposure to e.g. metals, persistent organic pollutants or endocrine disrupting chemicals has been shown to modulate epigenetic marks, not only in mammalian cells or rodents, but also in environmentally relevant species such as fish or water fleas. The associated changes in gene expression often lead to modifications in the affected organism's phenotype. Epigenetic changes can in some cases be transferred to subsequent generations, even when these generations are no longer exposed to the external factor which induced the epigenetic change, as observed in a study with fungicide exposed rats. The possibility of this phenomenon in other species was demonstrated in water fleas exposed to the epigenetic drug 5-azacytidine. This way, populations can experience the effects of their ancestors' exposure to chemicals, which has implications for environmental risk assessment. More basic research is needed to assess the potential phenotypic and population-level effects of epigenetic modifications in different species and to evaluate the persistence of chemical exposure-induced epigenetic effects in multiple subsequent generations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 314 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 20%
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Bachelor 53 16%
Student > Master 44 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 37 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 48%
Environmental Science 52 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Unspecified 3 <1%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 55 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,934,754
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#218
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,987
of 108,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.