| Title |
Verbal, Visual, and Intermediary Support for Child Witnesses with Autism During Investigative Interviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-017-3142-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy A. Henry, Laura Crane, Gilly Nash, Zoe Hobson, Mimi Kirke-Smith, Rachel Wilcock |
| Abstract |
Three promising investigative interview interventions were assessed in 270 children (age 6-11 years): 71 with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 199 who were typically developing (TD). Children received 'Verbal Labels', 'Sketch Reinstatement of Context' or 'Registered Intermediary' interviews designed to improve interview performance without decreasing accuracy. Children with ASD showed no increases in the number of correct details recalled for any of the three interview types (compared to a Best-Practice police interview), whereas TD children showed significant improvements in the Registered Intermediary and Verbal Labels interviews. Findings suggested that children with ASD can perform as well as TD children in certain types of investigative interviews, but some expected benefits (e.g., of Registered Intermediaries) were not apparent in this study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 36% |
| Australia | 4 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 74% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,015,215
of 25,113,446 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#345
of 5,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,308
of 315,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#11
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,113,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.