You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inhibition of colon carcinogenesis by a standardized Cannabis sativa extract with high content of cannabidiol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytomedicine, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.phymed.2013.11.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara Romano, Francesca Borrelli, Ester Pagano, Maria Grazia Cascio, Roger G. Pertwee, Angelo A. Izzo |
| Abstract |
Colon cancer is a major public health problem. Cannabis-based medicines are useful adjunctive treatments in cancer patients. Here, we have investigated the effect of a standardized Cannabis sativa extract with high content of cannabidiol (CBD), here named CBD BDS, i.e. CBD botanical drug substance, on colorectal cancer cell proliferation and in experimental models of colon cancer in vivo. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 221 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 20% |
| Canada | 20 | 9% |
| Japan | 13 | 6% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Thailand | 2 | <1% |
| Georgia | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Cayman Islands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 109 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 200 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 7% |
| Scientists | 4 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 252 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 19% |
| Unknown | 59 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 27 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 67 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#162,885
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Phytomedicine
#14
of 2,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,406
of 323,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytomedicine
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.