↓ Skip to main content

Feeling the future: prospects for a theory of implicit prospection

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Feeling the future: prospects for a theory of implicit prospection
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10539-013-9408-9
Authors

Philip Gerrans, David Sander

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 28%
Philosophy 6 14%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Design 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,708,224
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#566
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,080
of 306,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.