| Title |
Foreign-born health workers in Australia: an analysis of census data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-69 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joel Negin, Aneuryn Rozea, Ben Cloyd, Alexandra LC Martiniuk |
| Abstract |
Provide an up-to-date national picture of the medical, midwifery and nursing workforce distribution in Australia with a focus on overseas immigration and on production sustainability challenges. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#649,178
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#31
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,538
of 320,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.