| Title |
Facilitating accrual to cancer control and supportive care trials: the clinical research associate perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-154 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David VanHoff, Tanya Hesser, Katherine Patterson Kelly, David Freyer, Susan Stork, Lillian Sung |
| Abstract |
Accrual to Cancer Control and Supportive Care (CCL) studies can be challenging. Our objective was to identify facilitators and perceived barriers to successful Children's Oncology Group (COG) CCL accrual from the clinical research associate (CRA) perspective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Psychology | 3 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,359,382
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,732
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,813
of 304,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.