You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global Health and Emergency Care: A Resuscitation Research Agenda—Part 1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Academic Emergency Medicine, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/acem.12270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom P. Aufderheide, Jerry P. Nolan, Ian G. Jacobs, Gerald van Belle, Bentley J. Bobrow, John Marshall, Judith Finn, Lance B. Becker, Bernd Bottiger, Peter Cameron, Saul Drajer, Julianna J. Jung, Walter Kloeck, Rudolph W. Koster, Matthew Huei‐Ming, Sang Do Shin, George Sopko, Breena R. Taira, Sergio Timerman, Marcus Eng Hock Ong |
| Abstract |
At the 2013 Academic Emergency Medicine global health consensus conference, a breakout session on a resuscitation research agenda was held. Two articles focusing on cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitation are the result of that discussion. This article describes the burden of disease and outcomes, issues in resuscitation research, and global trends in resuscitation research funding priorities. Globally, cardiovascular disease and trauma cause a high burden of disease that receives a disproportionately smaller research investment. International resuscitation research faces unique ethical challenges. It needs reliable baseline statistics regarding quality of care and outcomes; data linkages between providers; reliable and comparable national databases; and an effective, efficient, and sustainable resuscitation research infrastructure to advance the field. Research in resuscitation in low- and middle-income countries is needed to understand the epidemiology, infrastructure and systems context, level of training needed, and potential for cost-effective care to improve outcomes. Research is needed on low-cost models of population-based research, ways to disseminate information to the developing world, and finding the most cost-effective strategies to improve outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 25% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,707,477
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Academic Emergency Medicine
#3,134
of 3,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,333
of 318,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Emergency Medicine
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.