↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Detoxification of Mycotoxins

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Microbial Detoxification of Mycotoxins
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10886-013-0321-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan P. McCormick

Abstract

Mycotoxins are fungal natural products that are toxic to vertebrate animals including humans. Microbes have been identified that enzymatically convert aflatoxin, zearalenone, ochratoxin, patulin, fumonisin, deoxynivalenol, and T-2 toxin to less toxic products. Mycotoxin-degrading fungi and bacteria have been isolated from agricultural soil, infested plant material, and animal digestive tracts. Biotransformation reactions include acetylation, glucosylation, ring cleavage, hydrolysis, deamination, and decarboxylation. Microbial mycotoxin degrading enzymes can be used as feed additives or to decontaminate agricultural commodities. Some detoxification genes have been expressed in plants to limit the pre-harvest mycotoxin production and to protect crop plants from the phytotoxic effects of mycotoxins. Toxin-deficient mutants may be useful in assessing the role of mycotoxins in the ecology of the microorganisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 215 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 17%
Student > Master 36 16%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 12 5%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 9%
Chemistry 17 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 60 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,318,528
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#177
of 2,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,320
of 197,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.