↓ Skip to main content

Biocontrol of the apple sawfly,Hoplocampa testudinea, with entomogenous nematodes

Overview of attention for article published in BioControl, December 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Biocontrol of the apple sawfly,Hoplocampa testudinea, with entomogenous nematodes
Published in
BioControl, December 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02372327
Authors

C. Vincent, G. Bélair

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
France 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 58%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BioControl
#150
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,009
of 65,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioControl
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them